Recently
in a library and information studies class discussion, a fellow student
commented that “homeless people are subverting libraries. They’re just using them as places to
sit around or to use the bathroom.” Thankfully,
most of the class shot this moron a disgusted look. The central element to librarianship
of any kind is service. And
as public servants we are in no position to judge or make demands of who we
will serve based on class or whether or not that person has a brick-and-mortar
place to call home.
I have been guilty
of making fun of some of the quirkier personalities who come into the library –
albeit anonymously, but still. I have also had the privilege of being
able to work closely with homeless people as well as those who choose to live
differently from the rest of society. Those
experiences have been frustrating, difficult, and sometimes smelly. But those people deserve the vital
community services that public libraries provide, like help searching for jobs, housing, and even families online. While I understand why some members of the library community
find sharing space with homeless people (whether perceived or otherwise)
uncomfortable, I disagree with policies, regulations, or influences from
neighborhood members that are meant to relegate how public library space is
used and who that space “should” be for.
Libraries have
been serving as places of respite for those without homes, many of whom have
mental illnesses, since their inception. Historically,
public libraries were developed as buildings for the elite and lower classes to
come together in a common space, leveling the societal playing field. And while public libraries should serve the
needs of all users equally, including segments of the population other
than homeless people, we need to remember that service to certain population
groups should not be contingent on who we would like to serve, but should be
based on who needs those services. The American Library Association
adopted a policy
almost thirty years ago that calls for libraries to respond to the growing
number of poor people, including those without homes, and to work within the
library to sensitize the greater community to the needs of these citizens as
well.
The fear among many community members is that public libraries will become "homeless shelters" and not serve other segments of the population, such as children and families. But if people fear this happening, it must mean that there is a noticeable need. And if the need is this great, why are we doing nothing more about it than worrying that we will be exposed to poor and homeless people in our public libraries?
In Los Angeles
homelessness is an issue that, in my opinion, has not effectively been
addressed. Yet, with the
number of public library branches in this city, and the resources offered at
the Central Library, we should be able to do more for our street-dwelling
population. The
Seattle Public Library has
been forward-thinking in this regard, and has been incorporating vital hygiene
and job-related services for people who live on the streets and use the
library’s facilities. With
the right balance of non-invasive security and updated policies, as well as
cooperation with other community service providers, Los Angeles and its
libraries could become a more welcoming and rehabilitative space for those who
need it most.
No comments:
Post a Comment